Posted by Dan Phelan on Wed, Jun 30, 2010 @ 01:57 PM
If so, is your construction company in the CCR (Central Contractor Registry)? According to an article in the May/June issue of Commercial Construction Magazine, probably not. Of the 885,000 or so construction companies in the United States, just over 20,000(2%!) are listed and approved to bid on federal construction projects. Considering that the federal government spent close to $317 BILLION on construction last year, a whole lot of construction firms are missing out on a huge opportunity to receive ARRA construction money. The biggest gripe we hear when we engage new prospective clients is that bid lists are too long, and the winning bidder will probably lose money on the job and probably be out of business by 2011.
The private sector of construction has dropped over 30% since 2006 and a dramatic rebound isn't in the cards yet, but Uncle Sam still has plenty of work for you on his roads, military bases, and large civil projects revolving around Hurrican and Storm Damage prevention. To find out how to get your name in the registry, and start bidding jobs with low competition, check out How To Be A Federal Construction Contractor.
If you do start winning Federal Construction Jobs, you'll realize that the Federal construction contractor insurance requirements you will be facing are slightly more in depth and complicated than what you and your insurance agent are probably used to. In addition to extra construction insurance coverages, you may also need to secure USL&H (Longshore Harbor Worker's Compensation Act)and acquire a Waiver of Governmental Immunity. Neither are easy to understand if you have never been required to have them before. Luckily, some of Construction Risk Advisor's clients do a considerable amount of Federal construction work and we have helped them navigate the complicated waters of procuring construction insurance quotes for Federal construction jobs.
Get yourself in the CCR (no, not Creedence Clearwater Revival) and get on the shortlist for winning some bids!
Posted by Robert Phelan on Thu, Apr 29, 2010 @ 01:54 PM

As I skimmed Saturday's Wall Street Journal, I saw a handsome couple featured in an ad for fractional jet ownership. The caption read, "Avantair allows us to be more productive and efficient as a law firm". My immediate thought was, "What kind of law firm uses a private jet?" I found the answer at their website.
They listed twelve settlements on their home page ranging from $350 million (United States record) all the way down to a measly $12 million. I guess that explains the jet as does the sub-header under their name, "Over $800 million in Verdicts and Recoveries". I believe that plaintiff's attorneys get 30-40% for their fee so on the conservative side that's $240 million. Not bad for a two person, husband and wife law firm!
You might think that your Connecticut construction company could never be exposed to the type of liability that would attract a law firm like this. Think again. Any business owner could go bankrupt tomorrow if they get on the wrong end of a lawsuit and lack the proper insurance coverage.
Here's a quick sampling of their settlements:
• $23.4 million against a drunk driver who killed three people. $13.5 million of the verdict was for punitive damages, uncovered by insurance. How certain are you that no one is ever drunk behind the wheel of one of your company vehicles?
• $25 million verdict for a man who fell while inspecting a building. Do you own any property? Could someone fall from a height of 12 feet? That's what happened here. (The verdict was in 1998. What would it be worth in 2010? $50 million?)
• $12 million for amputations due to electric shock
• In Miami-Dade County, Florida a jury awarded a 78-year-old woman and her husband $20.98 million for the injuries that she suffered in a car crash that left her on a ventilator for live. The plaintiff sued the driver and the driver's employer. The woman's attorneys successfully argued that the defendant driver was so distracted that he made no attempt to stop and slammed into the rear of the woman's car. After subpoenaing the employee driver's cell phone records they proved that he had been on the cell phone talking at the time. The case settled for $16.1 million five days after the verdict.
Connecticut construction company owners can't think they are immune from the liability described in the suits above. If you own property and you have employees and you own vehicles and equipment, you have the potential for a devastating lawsuit.
You need to change your buying criteria for insurance today. Contractors tend to go for the "fools gold" of cheap insurance. Don't you do that! You've worked hard to build your construction company. Get a good advisor and protect it with the right insurance coverage.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Fri, Apr 23, 2010 @ 06:56 AM
In my last post, I talked about finding the Hulk Hogan of insurance agents. To be more formal, you want a CRO or Chief Risk Officer. Since you probably don't have one on staff, you've got to find one and make him or her one of your Trusted Advisors.
Construction risk management has become a field unto itself. There is probably no more complicated area of insurance than insurance for contractors. The best practitioners are all specialists. It has become impossible to dabble in construction insurance. It's a full time job and you need the best.
It's a down economy, bid lists are long and all that "stimulus" money must have ended up in someone else's checkbook. So I'm not suggesting that you create a new position in your company just for insurance. I am suggesting that you outsource the risk management function to someone who has the skills and training to be your CRO. That is definitely not your typical insurance agent, mainly trained to sell you insurance policies.
Why is this so important? Think about the way you manage risk now. If you're like most of your peers, you've given "insurance buying" responsibilities to either someone on your finance staff or someone in the HR function. Even though their responsibility is limited to managing your insurance, they haven't even been trained to do that much less be your internal CRO. Do you really think that having a part time, overworked insurance buyer with no formal training is the best way to protect your business from catastrophic loss? I didn't think so.
You're probably thinking that you are paying your insurance agent to protect your business. Think again. First of all, most of them lack any level of training beyond what they learned to get a license. That's not very much when you consider half the curriculum was dedicated to homeowners and auto insurance and you can take the training in a week. If you want to see a deer in the headlights, ask your insurance agent if he is your CRO?
Insurance protects the most valuable asset you own, your business. And you need more than just insurance in today's world. You need a full complement of risk management services and a talented team of people who can execute a plan to mitigate and manage the risks faced by your business. Cheap insurance managed part time or a crack risk management team looking out for you like a bodyguard.
You decide.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Tue, Apr 20, 2010 @ 07:54 AM
Returning from a business trip recently I was relaxing in the Delta Sky Club at Hartsfield International in Atlanta. As I sipped a soda and ate some pretzels, Hulk Hogan walked in with a small entourage. He looks the same in real life as on TV - as big as a mountain and a little older but the same guy, the same twelve-time world heavyweight champion. He's 56 years old but you wouldn't want to mess with him. He is still "winning" fights this year! Read about it on wikipedia
What does Hulk Hogan have to do with insurance for contractors? A lot, if you look at the world through my eyes.
If you ever needed a bodyguard, he's your man. Read his biography at the link above. He got in the ring with the biggest and the baddest and came out on top. He was the face of WWF(Now WWE). He is a winner and the world knows it. Hogan fought to the finish and intimidated other giants of the game. If I could choose a bodyguard, Hulk Hogan would be my first choice.
If you're a business owner, after protecting your life and family, your business would probably come next. For most construction company owners, their business is their most valuable asset. But surprisingly, I can almost guarantee, none of you know the biography of the person you have chosen to protect your business, your insurance agent or broker. Why is that? How could that be?
It's simple really. Contractors buy insurance the same way they operate in their own world - low bidders win. So instead of making insurance choices based on the capabilities of the people providing the service, they buy cheap insurance.
Do you really think there is no difference between a risk advisor with thirty years of experience and a trainee insurance agent with a cheap price? After all the hard work you've put into building your business, do you really want to entrust its protection to someone you've just met? Someone whose training and skills are unknown to you?
Insurance for contractors is as complex now as it has ever been. The risks you encounter can easily produce multi-million dollar liabilities. If your workers compensation claims aren't managed properly, your EMR (experience Mod Rate) can skyrocket and destroy your ability to compete.
Don't trust the protection of your business to just anyone. When you look across the desk the next time you make an insurance buying decision, ask yourself this: Is this the Hulk Hogan of insurance agents? If you have any doubt, reconsider. Your business depends on it.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Mon, Mar 15, 2010 @ 12:49 PM
Preventing Losses
Written by Robert Phelan
Can pro football offer lessons about how to run your construction business? Well, some of the challenges you face are much like those that face Coach Bill Belichick of the Patriots or Coach Tom Coughlin of the Giants.
Like them, you have to protect your "blind side." Failing to do so can bring big losses on a football field and in your business.
In his book "The Blind Side," author Michael Lewis reveals how football strategy has changed over the past 25 years.
One player in particular spurred change. Lawrence Taylor - the legendary "LT" - was right linebacker and a feared defenseman who typically made quarterbacks shake in their cleats.
Taylor always said his mission was to "destroy" the quarterback - which he nearly did when he once broke two bones in Joe Theismann's leg in a famous Redskins game.
Most quarterbacks are right-handed, so their blind side is their left. When they turn their heads to follow their right arm, they can't see what's coming at them from the other side. If it happens to be Lawrence Taylor fast approaching, they need the best protection they can possibly have in the left tackle position.
Because of Taylor, the left tackle position on the offensive line suddenly became one of the most important positions on the team.
Meanwhile, Bill Walsh, coach of the San Francisco 49ers, built an offensive strategy based on short passes. Joe Montana and his successor, Steve Young, moved the ball down the field and won three Super Bowl championships with this new strategy. The key element was the ability of the left tackle - the best player on the offensive line - to protect the quarterback's blind side.
What's the lesson for your business? It's one that affects you every day when you bid on jobs and try to fulfill contracts you already have. You have to know that you have a blind side that contains all those risks that can potentially destroy your business. These risks that exist in our world today are bigger and more complex than ever before.
As a business owner, do you ever go to sleep at night staring up at the ceiling, wondering what's going to get through your "offensive line?" There's a world out there full of Lawrence Taylors ready to destroy your business. As you look out at your construction operations, you may see heavy equipment, workers exposed to extreme and stressful work environments, and fleets of automobiles and trucks on the highway every day, which are vulnerable to weather conditions and other drivers who are not paying attention. All of those things look like accidents waiting to happen.
In 2001, a salesperson working for a building supply wholesaler was talking on his cell phone while driving a pickup truck. He ran a stop sign and plowed into a vehicle, injuring a 78-year-old passenger. She sued the wholesaler, a large multistate company, and the jury ultimately awarded her $21 million. The company was insured, but it had much less than $21 million worth of liability insurance.
This is a frightening number for any company to see because probably all of
us have gotten distracted while driving. It just takes one moment and a catastrophe could wipe out a company built and sustained for generations.
Last year, a job site crew for one of my clients had just finished a safety meeting when the foreman, who was sitting in a loader and wasn't paying attention, dropped a bucket on another worker's leg. If it weren't for the quick response and medical attention he received, this worker probably would have lost his leg. It would have been a multimillion-dollar loss instead of a relatively quick recovery.
Another sobering example occurred when a bridge contractor had an employee working in an elevator shaft. He was their most experienced and safest employee. It was the end of his shift, and he thought to himself, "I just need to do one more task, take one more minute." He stretched himself beyond the safe zone and fell 30 or 40 feet down the elevator shaft, landing on his back and his legs, breaking the femurs in both legs. He would have been killed if there hadn't been loose pieces of plywood stacked in the bottom.
Everything you've worked for can vanish in a moment. It would only take one multimillion-dollar catastrophe to either leave your business with an uninsured loss or stuck with such exorbitant insurance premiums that you can't really compete anymore.
Force yourself to ask this question, "If one of our workers was involved in an automobile accident where someone was seriously hurt because the worker was texting on a cell phone, could I afford a $21 million jury verdict?"
When you have a serious accident, your workers' comp experience mod rate will soar. This is a number that compares your claims experience to other contractors of your type. If your mod rate is say, 2.0, your premiums will be twice as expensive as average. A high mod rate can put your construction company on the edge of viability.
So, who - or what - is your "left tackle?" Here are a couple real-life ideas:
First, it's an unremitting, 24/7 effort on safety. Hazards never sleep. Safety can't ever take a break, either. You have to create a safe culture. Some of the biggest companies, notably Turner Construction, have done an exemplary job with safety, striving to get as close as possible to zero losses. Small- and middle-market construction companies can do the same thing - and they must.
Second, it's having enough of the right kind of insurance, which becomes more affordable over time as you rack up an outstanding safety record year after year.
These two ideas alone could provide you with a measure of safety equal to a left tackle holding back Lawrence Taylor. It's a blind side you simply must patch up.
Robert Phelan is CEO of Construction Risk Advisors in Torrington, Conn.
Link to the article on Building & Construction Northeast's site
If you liked this article, please retweet or post to facebook.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Thu, Jan 14, 2010 @ 09:40 AM
The following article is taken form the web site of Connecticut-based law firm
Stratton Faxon who represented the plaintiff in the case described here. There are four points for contractors to pay attention to:
1) Safety has to be a cultural imperative for your company
2) You have to read all contracts and understand the liabilities imposed by them
3) Think twice about using temporary help. What looks inexpensive in the short run can be very expensive in the long run if you lose your immunity to be sued by an injured worker
4) Re-think your limits of liability. This is a precedent-setting case and an injury like this can happen to a contractor of any size. $10 Million is the new minimum limit.
November 2, 2009
BIG SETTLEMENT RAISES JOB SITE LIABILITY ISSUES
In the highest-ever construction injury settlement in Connecticut history, and one of the state's costliest personal injury cases, a North Canaan laborer has settled a federal negligence suit for $11.35 million.
The case of Benjamin Wohlfert v. Stop & Shop and Pyramid Contractors is bound to raise serious new questions about construction hiring practices and insurance. Contractors might now think twice about hiring tradesmen from temporary agencies without paying directly for their workers' compensation coverage. While not paying workers' comp premiums saves money at the outset, it leaves contractors more vulnerable to unpredictable tort liability down the line.
"We have seen a trend toward the hiring of temp workers because the contractors feel it is cheaper to do that than employ a union laborer," said plaintiff's attorney Joel Faxon of New Haven's Stratton & Faxon. "Historically, unions have had very strict training and safety practices. In the temporary worker market, there's no specific safety training requirement."
Benjamin Wohlfert, then 29, was working for Providence, R.I.-based Pyramid in March 2006 at the construction site of a North Canaan supermarket. Pyramid hadn't hired Wohlfert directly. Torrington-based Alternative Employment Inc. "leased" Wohlfert to Pyramid.
Wohlfert was with two other men -- carpenters Gerald Bates and Jean Kennedy -- both of whom were working for Pyramid in a similar arrangement with other temp agencies.
It happened to be St. Patrick's Day. "The boys are probably thirsty," said Faxon. "It doesn't take a genius to find that."
Perhaps that's what led them to do something dangerous. Before knocking off for the day, they had to retrieve from the roof of the project a metal-cutting tool, known as a plasma cutter. But the one ladder to the roof had already been removed by the roofers. So Bates, who was the de facto foreman, instructed Kennedy and Wohlfert to get into a three-sided plywood box used for picking up construction debris.
Bates then lifted the box with a type of forklift that was not designed to pick up people. When the lift was some 25 feet in the air, the box began to break apart. Kennedy jumped to the roof - and to safety. Wohlfert fell to the ground, severely injuring his spine, and became a paraplegic. He required spinal fusion surgery, two months of hospitalization, and was transferred to a Colorado rehabilitation facility for "several more months," according to federal court documents.
After returning to Connecticut, he suffered from infections and had to be hospitalized again. During the second hospital stay, he contracted the drug-resistant bacterial infection known as MRSA, and had to have a substantial portion of his hip removed.
Temp Pros, Cons
The use of construction workers from temp agencies has some advantages for general contractors. By paying the agency a premium over the worker's normal hourly wage, the contractor no longer has to handle the paperwork and expense of workers' compensation coverage, payroll or unemployment insurance. Union contracts, requirements and protections also don't come into play.
As one Pyramid supervisor testified in a deposition, a worker doesn't need to be fired or laid off. The temp agency is simply notified that he or she is "no longer needed," with a notation on his or her time card. This effortless termination process removes the threat of a suit for discriminatory firing.
But because Pyramid did not pay the workers' compensation insurance for Wohlfert, it did not get the benefit of the workers comp "bar" to a civil suit. In other words, Wohlfert was able to collect workers' comp payments without jeopardizing his ability to sue Pyramid, which wasn't his actual employer.
Wohlfert went on to sue Pyramid and Stop & Shop directly in federal court, and that was the case that recently settled for $11.35 million. At first he was represented by Trumbull lawyer Richard G. Kascak Jr., of Mihaly & Kascak, who referred the matter to Stratton & Faxon.
Most often, co-workers such as Wohlfert, Bates and Kennedy cannot sue each other for on-the-job injuries. But that was not the case here, because all were hired by temp agencies. Wohlfert sued Kennedy, TradeSource, Bates and Spec Personnel in Bridgeport Superior Court. That case is scheduled for trial in May 2010.
Pyramid was represented by James G. Geanuracos, of West Hartford's Malliet & Geanuracos. "We're under a confidentiality agreement to only disclose the name of the plaintiff and the settlement amount," Geanuracos said. "I can't comment further."
Pyramid also sued several third party co-defendants. They included carpenter Bates, an Orleans, Mass. resident; his Fairfield temp agency, Spec Personnel; carpenter Kennedy; and his Warwick, R.I., temp agency, TradeSource Inc.
After Pyramid brought in TradesSurce and Kennedy as co-defendants to share in any potential liability imposed, TradeSource countersued Pyramid. The personnel agency said that its employment contract had an indemnity clause purportedly requiring the general contractor to hold TradeSource harmless from any on-the-job liability. On Oct. 29, TradeSource and Pyramid settled and withdrew their federal court claims.
Unexpected Deep Pocket
Normally workers' compensation coverage limits the liability exposure of contractors and building project owners, like Pyramid and Stop & Shop. But the fact that separate employment agencies were making the payments to the three key workers prevented the contractor and owner from enjoying the protection and benefit of the workers' comp bar. In such a case, the injuries suffered by Wohlfert become liabilities in the less predictable realm of tort law, to be compensated from general liability coverage. It was no different than if a member of the general public was injured on the job site.
In this regard, this case is analogous to the momentous construction case of state case of Pelletier v. Sordoni-Skanska, in which a subcontractor's employee won a $23 million verdict against the general contractor. The defendant in that case, like the defendants in the Wohlert case, had the means to pay a huge judgment. But in the Pelletier case, Sordoni won a 2008 reversal at the state Supreme Court, and contractors breathed a sigh of relief.
In the current case, no new case law has been created, but the large settlement is a loud and clear warning of the potential risks when hiring temporary workers through an agency.
General contractor Pyramid, in its federal court actions, has advanced an untested legal theory. It noted that it paid a premium over the workers' normal salary to the three temp agencies. Pyramid contended that by doing so, it was in essence paying for their workers' comp insurance, and deserved to get the legal benefits of doing so.
Various defendants in the federal case had motions for summary judgment pending when the case largely settled, and U.S. District Judge Alfred V. Covello had not ruled on any of them. Now that the two main defendants have settled the federal action, there is no longer any need for Covello to rule on the outstanding summary judgment motions. It is therefore not likely that any court will now rule on the defendants' theory of "pass- through" workers' compensation immunity.
Covello, in a ruling on a motion to dismiss last year, signaled that he was unlikely to embrace that theory, said Faxon, because a Connecticut statute specifically states that the temp agencies are responsible for paying the workers' comp coverage. Another statute says the benefit or tort immunity flows to the employer paying the workers' comp premium, he added.
"The statute is very specific about who can claim workers' comp immunity from suit in a leasing arrangement," said Faxon, "and it's only the temp agency.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 @ 09:03 AM
The job of an insurance agent/broker is to sell insurance policies on behalf of the insurance companies they represent. Even worse, 95% of them are generalists who are only partially dedicated to the construction industry. This means that if you are relying on them to help you with COI administration, don't hold your breath.
A specialized Risk Advisor, dedicated to the construction industry is a different animal. They are a pro-active service provider who understands COI administration in minute detail. If you were to engage one of them, this is the process they would help you implement:
• If you are an upstream party, they would work with you and your legal counsel to be sure you've transferred downstream as much risk as possible
• They would also help you keep your contract current with legal developments in your jurisdiction as well as insurance coverage enhancements and changes
• If you are a downstream party, they would either read or train someone on your staff to read the insurance specifications on every job you bid, and advise what to agree to as well as push-back on
• They would make sure that the coverage you have is adequate to comply with the types of contracts you are signing
If you are an upstream party, they would provide you with the "Perfect COI". This would be a sample COI you provide to all subcontractors and sub-subs to show them exactly how you want the COI to read along with any attachments required (additional insured endorsements, waiver of subrogation, copy of specialty coverage policy, etc.)
Lastly, they would teach someone at your construction firm the process of checking every Certificate of Insurance for as long as the downstream party is obligated to you. This is the final element without which all the others are meaningless. It is also the fourth and final "C" in the C4 process and the subject of my next post.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Mon, Dec 21, 2009 @ 08:04 AM
You really don't want to hear this but I won't be of any use to you if I don't tell it straight. There are three reasons that COIs don't work well for the construction industry:
Ignorance
Laziness
Weak COI Administration
Ignorance - Every party to the COI is ignorant in one way or another.
The lawyers who draft the insurance language that goes in the job specifications and contract are ignorant about the nuances of insurance coverage and many times use antiquated or inappropriate language
Insurance underwriters think that their clients have perfect insurance administration systems
Insurance agents, who are often generalists, don't begin to understand the intricacies of the specific coverage forms required in construction contracts
Upstream owners and contractors don't understand what they should be looking for when they receive a COI
Downstream subs and sub-subs don't know really know if the COI they are sending upstream accurately reflects their true coverage or whether it's what the contract requires
Laziness -
All parties are lazy about changing a system they don't realize is broke.You,the contractor, can't be lazy any longer! Got it? This little piece of paper called a Certificate of Insurance (COI) can mean the difference between staying in business and shutting the doors. You have to figure out what it (the COI) means and how to administer them (all the COIs you send or receive) or be prepared to keep the $$ around to pay an uninsured claim. 
Weak COI Administration - It's rare to find a contractor with a bulletproof system
In most construction firms, this amounts to nothing more than attaching whatever COI is provided (by a downstream party) to the appropriate contract and making sure that the coverage is renewed for as long as the job remains active. This doesn't cut it any more.
In the next post I'll describe the ideal COI administration system that a Risk Advisor would implement with you.
Read part 1 of our 3 part series on COIs
Posted by Robert Phelan on Fri, Dec 18, 2009 @ 10:03 AM
In its simplest form, a COI is a single sheet document that describes the insurance
coverage of a contractor. It includes such details as the insurance carrier(s), policy term, limits of coverage, the agent providing the coverage, notice of cancellation provisions and other pertinent coverage details.
Unfortunately, insurance policies have become very complex documents and it is impossible to represent them properly on a single sheet of paper. (As I wrote that last sentence, I realized that maybe that's the problem. The COI form has not kept pace with the complexity of construction contracts.)
Maybe at this point you say, "Big Deal! I've been providing/receiving COIs forever and it hasn't hurt me yet." I'll promise you this. It will if you don't change and you should care because your business is at stake. Giving or receiving a bad COI is like the iceberg was to the Titanic. By the time the problem is spotted, the disaster (uncovered claim) has already occurred.
Here's what a COI won't tell you:
- Whether one or more of the insurance companies being used is financially unsound
- Almost 100% of the time, one or more parties are required to be added as Additional Insureds on one or more policies. In most cases, a COI won't tell you if the right Additional Insured endorsement has been used. There used to be one or two of these endorsements. Now there are dozens.
- If coverage is required to be kept in place for one or more years after project completion and you don't get a new COI every year, you won't know if the party providing the COI has maintained the required coverage.
- Specialty coverages like pollution, professional and builders risk are all written on non-standard forms. A simple COI tells you nothing other than the limit. The limit is meaningless if the coverage is non-existent due to exclusions.
- Lastly, but maybe most importantly, nothing on the COI will tell you whether the coverage is in compliance with the contract specification. Only a trained human being can tell you that.
In my next post I'll describe the three reasons all contractors struggle with COIs.
Posted by Robert Phelan on Thu, Dec 17, 2009 @ 07:42 AM
Let's say you've done everything right. Let's say you've got all the coverage you need for upstream parties and your specifications to downstream parties spell out exactly what is required by of them. Most contractors think their job is over. All they have to do is keep a current COI on file (upstream or downstream) until project completion. Far from it but this is where the system breaks down. Most contractors have no one on their staff that is trained to "Check" a COI to be sure it matches the requirements in the contract.
What if the insurance carrier(s) is changed and the new one has financial problems?
What if limits are changed?
What if the Additional Insureds are left off the renewal policy?
What if specialty coverage is discontinued?
What if coverage has to be maintained for three years and you stop checking after job completion?
What if your sub didn't even read the spec and just gave you their standard COI? Would you even know?
What if you misread the spec (or your agent did) and you're providing the wrong coverage to an upstream party?
What if you change carriers and you don't realize that the new (and cheaper) coverage isn't as broad as what you had before?
There are lots of "What ifs"; any one of which could be disastrous to your business. So why does no one pay attention to this critical element? Because it takes discipline, consistency, education and training to manage COIs properly.
Most contractors think that all COIs are created equal. That as long as they have the COI they're all set. If something bad happens and the sub doesn't have the right coverage, you can sue them and recover. Maybe. For a serious uninsured claim, the sub won't have millions in their checking account even if you prove them wrong.
Building a process to make COI administration bulletproof does not have to be difficult or intimidating. A Risk Advisor can assist you, guide you or train you to execute flawlessly. Contact us today to learn more.